In the last few days I've been pretty
busy with university stuff, so please excuse me for not talking about
this sooner.
So many of you probably have heard
about this Nintendo affiliate program, but allow me to give a brief
recap.
A short time ago Nintendo launched the
Nintendo Affiliate Program, which allows Youtuber to become licensed
Nintendo partners. With this the Youtuber don't have to worry about
contend strikes anymore, as their contend is now officially licensed
by Nintendo. Nintendo also gets the right to claim some percentage of
the revenue generated by your Nintendo centric videos for themselves.
These are 40% if your channel also hosts non Nintendo content and 30%
if you host only Nintendo content.
So let me state this directly. I don't
have anything against Nintendo trying to claim some money from Lets
Plays. You earn money with their content after all. 40 and even 30%
seem a bit high though. I thin 10-15% revenue share would be fair.
But only on lets plays. Reviews and other content should and are protected under the fair use clause and Nintendo has no right to claim anything on such videos.
But only on lets plays. Reviews and other content should and are protected under the fair use clause and Nintendo has no right to claim anything on such videos.
And here start the problems of this
service. Not only do you agree to share revenue with Nintendo, but
you also hand them the rights to use your videos in any of their
promotions and, more important, you agree to follow their strict
rules.
These rules encompass the standard
stuff, like not producing any adult themed content, but the important
part is the vagueness of the rules. What goes and goes not isn't
clearly stated in the contract, but is up for Nintendo to decide.
These vagueness is a big problem. For example Nintendo reserves
itself the right to change the rules anytime and to decide every
month how much of the revenue generated by your videos is actually
given to you.
The next huge problem is that Nintendo
forbids its partners to talk about the program or even hint that they
are affiliated with Nintendo. In the light of other recent (and still
ongoing) discussion about ethics and corruption in video game
coverage, this is just plain stupid.
And the last point is that Nintend
reserves the right to review all videos before they're uploaded and
change them if they deem it necessary.
To put it simply the Nintendo Affiliate
Program is a huge blow to the freedom of speech. Like so many times
before Nintendo shows that they're not really getting on with the
times. To put it bluntly. This is a truly stupid move from my
favorite video game company. Trying to control the flow of
information has never worked before and I hope it doesn't start to
work now. That's why I hope that many people stand up against this
program and tell Nintendo their view on it. Because as fans we should
be first to point out mistakes. A true fan is also the harshest
critique of his product of choice.
Sadly I haven't seen much backlash so
far. Yes some notable Youtubers like Totalbiscuit, PweDiePie or Jim
Sterling have spoken against it and many media outlets have at least
ran one story about it, but from the general public, from the
customer there has been nothing so far. Many remain silent on the
topic.
Following GamerGate discussions one can often read that they will deal with Nintendo at a later time because they need to keep concentrating their efforts on their SJW enemies and sites like Kotaku and so on.
And while I support the stated goal of GamerGate and the idea behind it, I don't think that we should overlook Nintendo. The program is still in its Beta-stage, so we still have time to force some fundamental changes, because as it stands now it is an attack on freedom of speech. Nintendo will decide which content is shown and which is shunned. And if they're successful with this then other companies will surely follow suit.
Following GamerGate discussions one can often read that they will deal with Nintendo at a later time because they need to keep concentrating their efforts on their SJW enemies and sites like Kotaku and so on.
And while I support the stated goal of GamerGate and the idea behind it, I don't think that we should overlook Nintendo. The program is still in its Beta-stage, so we still have time to force some fundamental changes, because as it stands now it is an attack on freedom of speech. Nintendo will decide which content is shown and which is shunned. And if they're successful with this then other companies will surely follow suit.
In the end a content creator should be
able to make money with his chosen profession. A review of Super
Smash Bros. should be able to create revenue under fair use.
With its program Nintendo tries to bind creators to itself and make them financially dependent. And that is just bullshit.
With its program Nintendo tries to bind creators to itself and make them financially dependent. And that is just bullshit.
+ Nintendo doesn't even need to pull
such shit. They're games are nearly always top notch.
TL;DR
Nintendos Affiliate Program is
bullshit. In its current iteration it's a blatant try to censor and
control opinions. I think it's ok for Nintendo to receive a small
share or revenue (10-15%) for lets plays, but reviews and other
content falls under fair use.
As fans we can't let such a blatant try of censoring free speech stand and should demand a change in the policies because better games coverage benefits us all.
As fans we can't let such a blatant try of censoring free speech stand and should demand a change in the policies because better games coverage benefits us all.
and as always
Thanks for reading
No comments:
Post a Comment