Soo this happened... On an conference
Satoru Iwata announced that Nintendo would team up with Japanese
Mobile company DeNA to bring Nintendo Ip to smart devices. Full blown
games. And the reaction have been split. While the business world was
euphoric, resulting in a rise of Nintendos stock by 32%, many gamers
remain skeptic of this whole proposition. Now first let's state what
was actually said in this conference.
Nintendo will develop completely new
titles for smart phones. They won't port existing 3DS or Wii-U games.
The development of this titles will be done mostly by Nintendo
themselves with DeNA providing their knowledge on Online
Infrastructure. DeNA will also be tasked with building a membership
program, which will encompass Wii-U, 3DS, future Nintendo consoles,
PC and smart devices. You will be access it from any of these
platforms. At the same time Nintendo assured everyone that they'll
still keep developing and producing dedicated gaming platforms, with
the announcement of the NX. It's not sure if this will be a 3DS or
Wii-U successor or a third pillar, and it won't be talked about till
next year. It was only announced to assure everyone that Nintendo
doesn't plan to leave the console market any time soon.
Iwata also talked about the pricing
model of their games on smart devices in an interview later on. He
said that they are looking into all pricing models, but don't plan on
using any exploitative pricing. Some took this as declaration, that
Nintendo won't offer any free to play games, but I'm not sure about
that.
That is what was roughly said on the
conference. If you want to read it fully, you can do so under this
link:
http://www.perfectly-nintendo.com/nintendo-and-dena-press-conference-full-text-and-video-transcript-available-in-english/
First let me say that I don't like
smartphone games. I don't play them and I have completely no interest
in them. I'll still try to see all this from a neutral perspective,
but I just wanted you to know that.
Now let's talk about the games. Iwata
said, that they would develop completely new software and not port
any existing games from their consoles. While this is nice, it also
begs the question how they will be able to that? As it is now
Nintendo barely manages to supply 3DS and Wii-U with enough software
to keep everyone occupied. Even if the games for smart devices won't
take any significant workforce, which I doubt, they still will pull
these people, however few they may be, away from other projects. This
can simply be countered by increasing the number of employees, but so
far Nintendo hasn't announced anything.
I'm also a fan of them not porting any
existing games onto smart devices. Everyone who has played a Version
of Mario World or Super Mario Bros. on their Smartphone knows that
the controls are nightmares. And locking the games behind additional
accessorizes like controller add-ons will only diminish mass appeal.
So for now this approach is probably the best and let's see how it
will turn out.
However ignoring the Virtual Console would be stupid by the likes of Nintendo, so I'm counting on them releasing several classic games (which work with touch controls) on smart devices.
However ignoring the Virtual Console would be stupid by the likes of Nintendo, so I'm counting on them releasing several classic games (which work with touch controls) on smart devices.
Next is the new membership program. We
knew that something was coming since Nintendo send good old Club
Nintendo into retirement. This new program will be created by DeNA
and will encompass several devices. We don't have any hard facts
about it, but I'm not really looking forward to it. I think that
Nintendo may go the route of Sony and Microsoft and offer a paid
service. Now I don't have a problem with paid services. Playstation
Plus during the PS 3 era was awesome, but what I don't like is it
being mandatory. I enjoyed Nintendos offering of free multiplayer
this generation and I don't think it's really lacking. The games I
played so far with Mario Kart 8 and Smash Bros. have been lag free
and I rarely had disconnects.
What I would prefer is a two rail
method. Offer a basic program for free, which includes free
Multiplayer, the discount for regular buyers and other basic
components, which the program will have. Also offer a paid membership
program, which will include, for example, a free game every month
like Sony and Microsoft already offer.
The NX was the next point. I can't say
much about it, because there is hardly any information out. We just
know that it is a dedicated gaming platform and that it will have a
brand new concept. Many people think that this may be a new third
pillar next to Wii-U and 3DS but I don't think so. It would be a
stupid move, because Nintendo can barely provide support for two
platforms and together with games for smart devices the number would
increase to four. The original DS was also announced as a third
pillar next to home consoles and the Game Boy brand. It should focus
on casual gamers, while Game Boy would remain the Hardcore handheld
brand. But this place is now taken by smart devices. So what could NX
be? Well Iwata mentioned that it will have a brand new concept, so
I'm thinking that the rumored Fusion Concept would be a plausible
choice. We won't find out till next year, but it is reassuring that
Nintendo will still provide classic console experiences.
Now for some questions regarding this whole thing.
Wont this devalue Nintendos
intellectual property?
This is completely in Nintendos own
hands. If the provide good experiences on smart devices for an
appropriate price there will be any problem. However it will be a
challenge for the company, because the classic smartphone crowd
aren't exactly loyal to brands. At least not to gaming brands. They
just buy whatever is at top of the app store.
Still Nintendos characters are well
known, so they have an advantage over the standard phone developer.
The greatest pitfall will be providing
adequate games for smart devices without devaluing their console
games. The price will be their greatest enemy. Lets talk in examples.
Nintendo offers a Captain Toad:
Treasure Tracker game on the app store. It costs 4.99 includes
several levels and can be extended with level packs for 0.99cents
each. The whole experience will cost around 10, which is
astronomically high for phone games, but this is just an example. Why
should I then pay 40 bucks on Wii-U to get Captain Toad: Treasure
Tracker? Smartphone gamers don't care for improved visuals or such
things. Most of them see games a just disposable time spenders. A
View that directly collides with Nintendos way of making games.
If Nintendo wants to be successful on
this market they need to play by the rules. It may not devalue their
IP, Fans will still be able to enjoy their quality home console
titles, but it also won't increase it, because smartphone gamers
don't really care for such things.
Won't this be direct competition for
the 3DS?
That is also my biggest fear. Nintendo
intends to funnel smartphone gamers towards their dedicated gaming
systems, but I'm not sure it will work. You want more Nintendo
experiences? Then check out our real systems. This may sound like a
good incentive at first, but I'm pretty sure that the smartphone
crowd will just shrug it off. Mmhh why should I buy this system for
nearly 200 bucks only to then pay 40 bucks for each game, when I can
have games for free and 0.99 each. In the worst case it will prevent
people from buying a 3DS because they can have the Nintendo
experience on their phones. That is a dilemma for the company, which
I don't know how they'll solve. On the one hand they can't make their
smartphones game shitty, because it will damage their brand, and on
the other they shouldn't be to good or people won't seek out their
dedicated gaming systems. While I don't think that their home console
business is in danger (quite ironic if you look at the current
situation of the Wii-U), I fear that this may be the firs signs of
dedicated Nintendo Handhelds. And that is a damn shame.
Isn't Smartphone gaming just a fad?
Well I also thought so and if you look
at companies like Rovio (Angry Birds) or Zynga (Farmville) you may be
right, but I don't think that Nintendo is comparable with them.
Nintendo has a brand recognition these two can only dream of. They
can provide a broad range of different characters and experiences for
smartphones. In that no current Smart Phone developer can really
compare. But what can be said, when looking at these companies, is
that the smartphone crowd is especially fickle.
Concluding:
I don't really mind Nintendo developing for smart devices, but I don't think it will have the effect they hope. Of course it will bring in a lot of cash, but the smartphone crowd doesn't really care for games. To them it's just a way to pass time. I don't think Nintendo will successfully bring many people from their smart devices to dedicated gaming platforms. In the worst case it will negatively impact their core business by creating direct competition for the 3DS. In the end it all boils down to Nintendos approach on this whole thing. They need to play the game and adjust to the price system on smart devices, while still making sure that their console titles stay appealing. We haven't seen any game for smartphones from them yet, but for the time being I remain cautious.
And as always
thanks for reading
No comments:
Post a Comment